Event Title

Effects of Caregiving Experience on Perception of Infant Vocalizations

Mentor 1

Rachel Albert

Location

Union Wisconsin Room

Start Date

24-4-2015 2:30 PM

End Date

24-4-2015 3:45 PM

Description

Caregivers’ responses to infant babbling have long-term effects on infant language learning. However, the factors that influence caregivers’ responses are not well understood. We hypothesize that caregiving experience impacts responses to and perceptions of infant vocalizations. To explore this hypothesis, we compared the responses of inexperienced non-mothers with non-mothers who had experience working with infants under two (e.g. childcare workers). Participants viewed a series of prerecorded audio-visual examples of infants vocalizing and were asked to provide an immediate response. Then, they were asked to rate each vocalization on a seven-point scale, which denoted how speech-like the babble sounded. Preliminary results suggest caregiving experience did influence perception of infant vocalizations as experienced and inexperience non-mothers significantly differed in their ratings of the quality of the vocalizations. We also compared the speech-ratings to previously collected data on mothers. Experienced non-mothers rated the vocalizations more similarly to mothers than inexperienced non-mothers. Analyses of differences in participant responses to the vocalizations are still ongoing. Determining how experienced and inexperienced caregivers respond to infant vocalizations clarifies our knowledge of the factors that influence infant language acquisition. Since most childcare providers in the U.S. are non-mothers, understanding the impact of caregiving experience on responding has potential implications for shaping infant language learning.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 24th, 2:30 PM Apr 24th, 3:45 PM

Effects of Caregiving Experience on Perception of Infant Vocalizations

Union Wisconsin Room

Caregivers’ responses to infant babbling have long-term effects on infant language learning. However, the factors that influence caregivers’ responses are not well understood. We hypothesize that caregiving experience impacts responses to and perceptions of infant vocalizations. To explore this hypothesis, we compared the responses of inexperienced non-mothers with non-mothers who had experience working with infants under two (e.g. childcare workers). Participants viewed a series of prerecorded audio-visual examples of infants vocalizing and were asked to provide an immediate response. Then, they were asked to rate each vocalization on a seven-point scale, which denoted how speech-like the babble sounded. Preliminary results suggest caregiving experience did influence perception of infant vocalizations as experienced and inexperience non-mothers significantly differed in their ratings of the quality of the vocalizations. We also compared the speech-ratings to previously collected data on mothers. Experienced non-mothers rated the vocalizations more similarly to mothers than inexperienced non-mothers. Analyses of differences in participant responses to the vocalizations are still ongoing. Determining how experienced and inexperienced caregivers respond to infant vocalizations clarifies our knowledge of the factors that influence infant language acquisition. Since most childcare providers in the U.S. are non-mothers, understanding the impact of caregiving experience on responding has potential implications for shaping infant language learning.