Date of Award

May 2018

Degree Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy

Department

English

First Advisor

S. Scott Graham

Committee Members

William Keith, David Clark, Caroline Gottschalk-Druschke, Rachel Bloom-Pojar

Keywords

Decisionmaking, Engagement, Policymaking, Rhetoric of Science, Science Communication, Wicked Problems

Abstract

This dissertation examines an emerging “engaged rhetoric of science, technology, and medicine” (ERSTM)—an effort to ensure rhetoric’s “broader impacts” by more directly engaging the practices of science and sociotechnical policymaking. Through careful analysis of engaged rhetorical practice, I identify divergent conceptualizations of both rhetoric and engagement and subsequently draw on new materialist rhetorical theory and empirical research on science communication and public engagement to advance “problem-oriented rhetorical catalysis” (PRC) as a mode of engagement capable of advancing rhetoric’s institutional value and ethical commitments without abandoning its core disciplinary expertise and areas of inquiry. I further suggest the PRC is uniquely suited to address “wicked problems” and as such represents a productive alternative to deficit- and transmission-model engagement.

Available for download on Thursday, May 21, 2020

Share

COinS