Authors

Daniele Armaleo, Duke University
Olaf Müller, Duke University
François Lutzoni, Duke University
Ólafur S. Andrésson, University of Iceland
Guillaume Blanc, Université de Toulon
Helge B. Bode, Fachbereich Biowissenschaften & Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life
Frank R. Collart, University of Illinois at Chicago
Francesco Dal Grande, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Center
Fred Dietrich, Duke University
Igor V. Grigoriev, US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute
Suzanne Joneson, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee at Waukesha
Alan Kuo, US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute
Peter E. Larsen, University of Illinois at Chicago
John M. Logsdon Jr., University of Iowa
David Lopez, Gilead Sciences
Francis Martin, Université de Lorraine
Susan P. May, Duke University
Tami R. McDonald, Duke University
Sabeeha S. Merchant, University of California - Berkeley
Vivian Miao, University of British Columbia
Emmanuelle Morin, Université de Lorraine
Ryoko Oono, University of California, Santa Barbara
Matteo Pellegrini, University of California, Los Angeles
Nimrod Rubinstein, National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
Maria Virginia Sanchez-Puerta, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
Elizabeth Savelkoul, University of Iowa
Imke Schmitt, Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Center
Jason C. Slot, The Ohio State University
Darren Soanes, University of Exeter
Péter Szövényi, University of Zurich
Nicholas J. Talbot, The Sainsbury Laboratory
Claire Veneault-Fourrery, Université de Lorraine
Basil B. Xavier, University of Iceland

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

7-23-2019

Abstract

Background: Lichens, encompassing 20,000 known species, are symbioses between specialized fungi (mycobionts), mostly ascomycetes, and unicellular green algae or cyanobacteria (photobionts). Here we describe the first parallel genomic analysis of the mycobiont Cladonia grayi and of its green algal photobiont Asterochloris glomerata. We focus on genes/predicted proteins of potential symbiotic significance, sought by surveying proteins differentially activated during early stages of mycobiont and photobiont interaction in coculture, expanded or contracted protein families, and proteins with differential rates of evolution. Results: A) In coculture, the fungus upregulated small secreted proteins, membrane transport proteins, signal transduction components, extracellular hydrolases and, notably, a ribitol transporter and an ammonium transporter, and the alga activated DNA metabolism, signal transduction, and expression of flagellar components. B) Expanded fungal protein families include heterokaryon incompatibility proteins, polyketide synthases, and a unique set of Gprotein α subunit paralogs. Expanded algal protein families include carbohydrate active enzymes and a specific subclass of cytoplasmic carbonic anhydrases. The alga also appears to have acquired by horizontal gene transfer from prokaryotes novel archaeal ATPases and Desiccation-Related Proteins. Expanded in both symbionts are signal transduction components, ankyrin domain proteins and transcription factors involved in chromatin remodeling and stress responses. The fungal transportome is contracted, as are algal nitrate assimilation genes. C) In the mycobiont, slow-evolving proteins were enriched for components involved in protein translation, translocation and sorting.

Conclusions: The surveyed genes affect stress resistance, signaling, genome reprogramming, nutritional and structural interactions. The alga carries many genes likely transferred horizontally through viruses, yet we found no evidence of inter-symbiont gene transfer. The presence in the photobiont of meiosis-specific genes supports the notion that sexual reproduction occurs in Asterochloris while they are free-living, a phenomenon with implications for the adaptability of lichens and the persistent autonomy of the symbionts. The diversity of the genes affecting the symbiosis suggests that lichens evolved by accretion of many scattered regulatory and structural changes rather than through introduction of a few key innovations. This predicts that paths to lichenization were variable in different phyla, which is consistent with the emerging consensus that ascolichens could have had a few independent origins.

Share

COinS